What Was The Average Harborne House Price in 1952?

What Was The Average Harborne House Price in 1952?

Well, what a weekend that was. Street parties, gatherings in the park, the purple bunting, egg and cress sandwiches, union jack flags, cheese and pineapple on cocktail sticks, and let's not forget the trifle – the Platinum Jubilee Party. And no decent party is worth its salt without a game or a quiz.

So, if you have post-Jubilee blues, let me ask you, how much was the average Harborne house worth in 1952? To start with, let me look at what a property is worth today in Harborne.
The average price paid for a property in the Harborne area
in the last 12 months was £367,470.
 
Now, let's go back to 1952. Sir Winston Churchill was the Prime Minister, Newcastle won the FA Cup, London was covered in the Great Smog, free prescriptions on the NHS ended (it cost 1 shilling or 5p in new money), and King George IV, at the age of 56 passed away on the 6th February, meaning Princess Elizabeth became the Queen - as for housing …

The average price of a Harborne home in 1952 was £3,001.
This means Harborne house prices are 121 times higher since 1952. Yet over the last 70 years, the country has been subjected to 4.5% per annum inflation.

The 1952 Harborne home is equivalent to £57,701 today
when adjusted for inflation.
 
This means Harborne house prices have increased by 504.8% in real terms since 1952.
 
So, does that mean house prices are more expensive today compared to 1952?
 
In 1952, the average annual male wage was £452, 8 shillings and 1 penny, meaning the average Harborne house was 6.63 times the average value of a wage. Today the average home is 8.85 times the average wage.
Yet let us not forget the average mortgage payment in 1952 was £11 per month. The average Brit earned £34 per month, meaning 32.3% of the household income was going on mortgage payments, whilst nationally today, according to Nationwide, it stands at 28%.
 
It's cheaper, in real terms, to buy a property in 2022 than in 1952.
And that’s the point, something things in ‘real terms’ (real terms being true spending power of the money after taking into account wages, costs and inflation) were more expensive and some cheaper 70 years ago. For example, in 1952, petrol was equivalent (in today’s inflation-adjusted prices) to £1.02 per litre, a pint of beer £2, half a dozen eggs £2.20, cheddar cheese £2.40 per 500g, a basic radio £430, a Hoover £530 and a 12-inch TV £1,600.
So back to the property, the Queen’s reign has seen some amazing house price rises in the UK, yet that growth hasn’t always been in a constant upward direction, as we have had a couple of dips along the way.



We had a house price crash in 1990, when the average value of a Harborne property dropped from £90,292 to £74,779 in 1996, only for them to start rising again.
Harborne saw another house price crash between 2008 and 2009, and the average house price dropped from £270,103 to £230,267 in a year.
So, what else has changed about property and housing since the Queen came onto the throne?

In 1952, only 32% of people owned their own home, whilst 50% of people rented from a private landlord and 18% rented a council house.

By the time of the Silver Jubilee in 1977, 56% of people owned their own home, with 12% of people privately renting and 32% renting from the council.
Come the Golden Jubilee in 2002, 70% of people owned their own home, with 11% of people privately renting and 19% renting from the council.

Today, 63% of people own their own home, 20% of people privately rent and 17% rent from the council.

So to conclude, as we look forward to the 21st century, I am sure the property market will be totally different again in 70 years.
I hope you enjoyed reading this article and do share it with your friends if you find it interesting.
P.S. for all you Rightmove fans, the average Harborne terraced home in 1952 was worth £2,971, and a semi in Harborne could be bought for, on average, £3,353.




395


Get in touch with us

Moving home has long been considered one of life’s most stressful events—but recent findings suggest the experience may be doing more than just raising stress levels. It’s actively discouraging people from moving again altogether.

April is a good time for buyers to focus on readiness rather than guesswork. In a market where choice has improved but confidence remains mixed, being organised can make all the difference when the right home comes along.

Larger estate agencies are often the most visible. Their boards are dotted across neighbourhoods, their branding is familiar, and their presence—both online and on the high street—can feel reassuring. There’s a perception that if an agent has more listings, they must be doing something right.

The UK’s buy-to-let sector has been under sustained pressure in recent years, but fresh data suggests that while landlords continue to leave the market, the pace of this so-called “exodus” may finally be beginning to ease. This shift is worth paying close attention to as it signals changing sentiment among investors and rise of new opportunities.